Evaluation of the Factoral Structure of the Problematic Social Media Use Scale Among Georgian Youth
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52340/bal/2024.02.08Keywords:
Problematic Social Media use, young people, Georgian version of Problematic social media use scale, factorial structure of the scale, psychometric indicators of the scaleAbstract
The development of digital technologies has brought a lot of benefits to humanity, but many studies conducted over the last three decades have revealed that their excessive, uncontrolled use leads to a number of negative consequences - distress, psychopathological symptoms, health problems, social, professional or academic disorders, etc. Sh. Moreover, some individuals may develop behavioral addiction-like symptoms. A meta-analysis conducted in 2022, which included more than two million people living in 64 countries, showed that 17.4% of the world's population is addicted to social networks. Consequently, Georgian psychologists need a reliable measuring tool to assess this problem. The purpose of the study was to check the factor structure and psychometric indicators of the already adapted Georgian version of Caplan's Problematic Use Scale (GPIUS2). 1013 participants were included in the study, including 77% women, average age 22.6±6.3. The factorial structure was tested by both exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Structural equation (SEM) modeling and mediation analysis were used to test the theoretical model. The conducted study confirmed the high reliability and validity of the Georgian version of the scale. The Georgian version of the Problematic Social Media use scale can be considered a reliable and valid psychodiagnostic tool. It can be used among young people for both research and psychological counseling purposes - to assess the risk of problematic consumption. The main results of the study are important for both client work and prevention purposes. It can be said that the key risk factor for the development of problematic consumption among Georgian youth is consumption for mood regulation, that is, it is the basis of the preference for online communication and insufficient self-regulation of the use of social networks. Therefore, use for mood regulation can be considered as a potential target for psychological intervention – both for psychological support and prevention.
References
Aboujaoude, E., & Gega, L. (2020). From digital mental health interventions to digital “addiction”: Where the two fields converge. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10:1017, 1-5.
Andreassen, C. (2015). Online social network site addiction. A comprehensive review. Curr. Addict. Rep. 2,, 175–184.
Assunção, R. S., & Matos, P. M. (2017). The generalized problematic internet use scale 2: Validation and test of the model to Facebook use. Journal of Adolescence, 54, 51–59.
Barke, A., Nyenhuis, N., & Kröner-Herwig, B. (2014). The German Version of the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2 (GPIUS2): A Validation Study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 1-9.
Billieux, J., Schimmenti, A., Khazaal, Y., Maurage, P., & Heeren, A. (2015). Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(3), 119- 123.
Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS (2th ed.). Taylor & Francis.
Caplan, S. E. (2010). Theory and measurement of generalized problematic Internet use: A two-step approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1089-1097.
Caplan, S. E., & High, A. C. (2007). Beyond excessive use: The interaction between cognitive and behavioral symptoms of problematic Internet use. Communication Research Reports, 23, 265-271.
Caplan, S. E., & High, A. C. (2011). Online Social Interaction, Psychosocial Well-Being, and Problematic Internet Use. В E. b. Abreu., Internet addiction: a handbook and guide to evaluation and treatment (стр. 35-54). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Davis, R., & Flett, G. (2002). Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic Internet use: Implications for pre employment screening. Cyberpsychology & Behavior; 5(4), 331-345.
Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). . London: SAGE Publications.
Fioravanti, G., Primi, C., & & Casale, S. (2013). Psychometric evaluation of the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2 in an Italian sample. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 10, 761-766.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research. Vol. 18. № 1.Р., 39–50.
Gámez-Guadix, M., Orue, & Calvete, E. (2013). Evaluation of the cognitive-behavioral model of generalized and problematic Internet use in Spanish adolescents. Psicothema, Vol. 25, No. 3, 299-306.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference. New York: NY: Routledge.
Izquierdo, I., Olea, J., & Abad, F. J. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis in validation studies: Uses and recommendations. . Psicothema, 26, 395-400.
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2011). Online social networking and addiction: a review of the psychological literature. International journal of environmental research and public health, 8(9), 3528–3552.
Kuss, D. J., & Lopez-Fernandez, O. (2016). Internet addiction and problematic Internet use: A systematic review of clinical research. orld Journal of Psychiatry, 6(1), 143–176.
Kuss, D., Griffiths, M., Karila, L., & Billieux, J. (2014). Internet addiction: a systematic review of epidemiological research for the last decade. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 20 (25), 4026-4052.
Laconi, S., Kaliszewska-Czeremska, K., Tricard, N., & Chabrol, H. K. (2018). The Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale-2 in a French sample: Psychometric evaluation of the theoretical model. L'Encéphale, Volume 44, Issue 3, 192-199.
LaRose, R., Lin, C. A., & Eastin, M. S. (2003). Unregulated Internet usage: Addiction, habit, or or deficient self-regulation? Media Psychology, 5, 225–253.
Meng, S., Cheng, J., Li, Y. Y., Zheng, J., Chang, X., Shi, Y., . . . Shi, J. (2022). Global prevalence of digital addiction in general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. Mar; 92:102128.
Moretta, T., & Buodo, G. (2018). Modeling Problematic Facebook Use: Highlighting the role of mood regulation and preference for online social interaction. Addict Behav., 87, 214-221.
Pontes, H. M., Caplan, S. E., & Griffiths, M. D. (2016). Psychometric validation of the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2 in a Portuguese sample. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 63, 823-833.
Probierz, E., Gałuszka, A. I., & Gałuszka, A. (2020). Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2: Results of Validation on Polish Sample. IEEE Access, Volume 8, 117615-117622.
World Health Organisation. (2014). WHO (2014). Public health implications of excessive use of the Internet, computers, smartphones and similar electronic devices. Tokto, Japan: National Cancer Research Centre.
ზუბაშვილი, ა. (2022). სოციალური ქსელების პრობლემური მოხმარების პრედიქტორები ახალგაზრდებს შორის. კავკასიის უნივერსიტეტი: სამაგისტრო ნაშრომი.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Business and Legislation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.