Psychometric analysis of the SCL-90-R and its short versions in youth

Authors

  • Elena Chomakhidze Sokhumi State University
  • Kakhi Kopalian Sokhumi State University
  • Anna Zubashvili

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52340/bal/2023.03.04

Keywords:

Georgian version of SCL-90-R, short versions, general psychological distress, specific primary symptoms of distress, symptom severity

Abstract

The Symptom Checklist-90-Revised was constructed to measure both general psychological distress and specific primary symptoms of distress. This study conducted a psychometric analysis of the Georgian version of the SCL-90 questionnaire and its short forms (BSI, SCL-27, BSI-18, SCL-14, SCL-K-9): the factor structure and reliability were studied, the equivalence of the full and short forms was tested. The study was conducted on a convenience sample, 464 subjects were selected to participate (79% female and 21% male, with a mean age of 21.4±6.2) completed SCL-90-R questionnaire. The items of the short versions were extracted from SCL-90-R. The results obtained indicate the high reliability of the SCL-90-R and its short forms: The Crombach alpha and McDonald's omega value is above 0.7. The correlation between the corresponding scales, as well as symptom severity indices of the full and short forms of the questionnaire, exceeds 0.9. The single-factor structure of both the long form and the five short forms of the questionnaire was confirmed, indicating the construct validity of the SCL-90-R and its short forms designed to measure the broad construct of psychological distress. The Symptom Questionnaire and its short forms provide a reliable and valid tool for the psychological assessment of psychological distress and psychopathological symptoms among youth. All forms of the questionnaire can be used both for research purposes and for psychological counseling.

Author Biographies

Elena Chomakhidze, Sokhumi State University

Academic doctor of psychology, SSU associate professor

Kakhi Kopalian, Sokhumi State University

Academic doctor of psychology, SSU professor

Anna Zubashvili

TSU doctoral student

References

Bech, P., Bille, J., Møller, S., Hellström, L., & Østergaard, S. (2014). Psychometric validation of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-90) subscales for depression, anxiety, and interpersonal sensitivity. J Affect Disord., 160, 98–103.

Derogatis, L. (1975). The SCL-90-R. Baltimore: Clinical Psychometric Research.

Derogatis, L. R. (2000). Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18): Administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Minneapolis: MN: National Computer Systems.

Derogatis, L. R., & Cleary, P. A. (1977). Factorial invariance across gender for the primary symptom dimensions of the SCL-90. British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 16, 347–356.

Derogatis, L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13, 595–605.

Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., & Covi, L. (1973). SCL-90: An outpatient psychiatric rating scale: Preliminary report. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 9 , 13–28.

Derogatis, L., Lipman, R., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E., & Covi, L. (1974). The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): a self-report symptom inventory. Behav Sci. 19(1):, 1-15.

Derogatis, L., Rickels, K., & Rock, A. (1976). The SCL-90 and the MMPI: a step in the validation of a new self-report scale. Br J Psychiatry. 128, 280–289.

Flora, D. (2020). Your Coefficient Alpha Is Probably Wrong, but Which Coefficient Omega Is Right? A Tutorial on Using R to Obtain Better Reliability Estimates. . Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, Vol. 3(4) , 484–501.

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference. New York: NY: Routledge.

Hardt, J., & Gerbershagen, H. (2001). Cross-validation of the SCL-27: a short psychometric screening instrument for chronic pain patients. . European Journal of Pain, 5, 187–197.

Harfst, T., Koch, U., Kurtz von Aschoff, C., Nutzinger, D., Rüddel, H., & Schulz, H. (2002). Development and validation of a short version of the Symptom-Check-List-90-R . DRV-Schriften, 33, 71–73.

Hayes, A., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use Omega Rather than Cronbach’s Alpha for Estimating Reliability. Communication Methods and Measures, 14:1, 1-24.

Kline, R. (2004). Beyond Significance Testing: Reforming Data Analysis Methods in Behavioral Research. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

L.R., D., Lipman, R., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E., & Covi, L. (1974). The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL). A measure of primary symptom dimensions. Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry; 7(0):, 79-110.

MacKenzie, S., Podsakoff, P., & Jarvis, C. B. (2005). The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 710–730.

McDonald, R. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. . Mahwah: L. Erlbaum Associates.

Paap, M., Meijer, R., Cohen-Kettenis, P., H., R.-A., de Cuypere, G., Kreukels, B., . . . Haraldsen, I. (2012). Why the factorial structure of the SCL-90-R is unstable: comparing patient groups with different levels of psychological distress using Mokken Scale Analysis. Psychiatry Res. 200(2–3), 819–826.

Prinz, U. N., Schulz, H., Petermann, F., Braukhaus, C., & Andreas, S. (2013). Comparative psychometric analyses of the SCL-90-R and its short versions in patients with affective disorders. . BMC Psychiatry. 13:104, 1–9.

PsycTests, APA. (2023). Symptom Checklist-90–Revised: Citation and Description. მოპოვებული https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Ft01210-000-დან

Revelle, W., & Condon, D. (2019). Reliability from α to ω: A tutorial. Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12), 1395-1411.

Rosen, C., Drescher, K., Moos, R., Finney, J., Murphy, R., & Gusman, F. (2000). Six- and ten-item indexes of psychological distress based on the Symptom Checklist-90. Psychol Assess, 7, 103–111.

Sereda, Y., & S., D. (2016). Validity assessment of the symptom checklist SCL-90-R and shortened versions for the general population in Ukraine . BMC Psychiatry (2016) 16, Atticle 300.

Smits, I. A., Timmerman, M. E., Barelds, D. P., & Meijer, R. R. (2014). The Dutch Symptom Checklist-90-Revised: Is the Use of the Subscales Justified? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, Advance online publication.

Trizano-Hermosilla, I., & Alvarado, J. M. (2016). Best Alternatives to Cronbach's Alpha Reliability in Realistic Conditions: Congeneric and Asymmetrical Measurements. Frontiers in Psychology, 7 , Article 769.

Wongpakaran, T., Wongpakaran, N., & Boripuntakul, T. (2011). Symptom checklist-90 (SCL-90) in a Thai sample. J Med Assoc Thai. 94(9): 1141–1149.

Zack, M., Toneatto, T., & Streiner, D. (1998). The SCL-90 factor structure in comorbid substance abusers. . J Subst Abuse.,10(1), 85–101.

Zinbarg, R., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ωH: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1), 123–133.

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

Chomakhidze ე. ., Kopalian კ. ., & Zubashvili ა. . (2023). Psychometric analysis of the SCL-90-R and its short versions in youth . Business and Legislation, 16(3), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.52340/bal/2023.03.04