Efficiency of Agro-Industrial Product Quality Assessment Systems: International Practices and Challenges for Georgia

Authors

  • Iuri Papaskua Sokhumi State University
  • Tsira Bartia

Keywords:

agro-industrial products, quality assessment, standardization, HACCP, traceability, digital transformation, food safety

Abstract

The assessment of agro-industrial product quality is a significant component of modern economic systems, influencing food safety, consumer trust, export potential, and national competitiveness.

The aim of this study is to analyze the efficiency of international agro-industrial product quality assessment systems and to identify opportunities for their adaptation to Georgia.

The research is based on comparative, institutional, and systemic analysis. Particular attention is devoted to Codex Alimentarius standards, HACCP principles, ISO 22000, the European Union’s “Farm to Fork” approach, the United States’ preventive control system, and the opportunities offered by digital traceability technologies.

Codex Alimentarius is internationally recognized as a set of standards, guidelines, and codes of practice designed to ensure food safety and fair trade, while within the WTO SPS Agreement it serves as an international reference framework for food safety regulation.

The findings demonstrate that quality assessment systems in developed countries are based on risk-oriented, integrated, and technologically supported approaches. In the case of Georgia, major challenges remain, including weak control of primary production, insufficient digital traceability, difficulties faced by small producers in adapting to international standards, and the need to strengthen institutional capacities.

The paper proposes an Integrated Digital Quality Assessment Model (IDQAM), which integrates standardization, institutional control, HACCP, laboratory assessment, digital traceability, data analytics, and support mechanisms for small producers.

Author Biographies

Iuri Papaskua, Sokhumi State University

Academic Doctor of Economic Sciences,

Professor

Tsira Bartia

Executive Manager, Innovation and Professional Development Committee, Federation of Auditors, Accountants and Financial Managers                                                                                               

References

Codex Alimentarius Commission. (2020). General Principles of Food Hygiene: CXC 1-1969. FAO/WHO;

World Trade Organization. (n.d.). Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. WTO;

Codex Alimentarius Commission. (2020). Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) System and Guidelines for Its Application. FAO/WHO;

European Commission. (2020). A Farm to Fork Strategy for a Fair, Healthy and Environmentally-Friendly Food System. Brussels: European Commission;

Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). U.S. FDA;

ISET Policy Institute. (2017). How Safe Is Your Food?

ISO. (2018). ISO 22000: Food Safety Management Systems — Requirements for Any Organization in the Food Chain. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization;

Kumar, S., & Singh, R. (2021). Blockchain-based traceability systems in agri-food supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125–138;

Zhang, Y., & Chen, X. (2022). Big data analytics in food safety risk management. Food Control, 133, 108–117;

Aung, M. M., & Chang, Y. S. (2014). Traceability in a food supply chain: Safety and quality perspectives. Food Control, 39, 172–184;

საქართველოს პარლამენტი. (2012). სურსათის/ცხოველის საკვების უსაფრთხოების, ვეტერინარიისა და მცენარეთა დაცვის კოდექსი. საქართველოს საკანონმდებლო მაცნე;

საქართველოს გარემოს დაცვისა და სოფლის მეურნეობის სამინისტრო. (2024). 2024–2027 წლების სურსათის უვნებლობის სახელმწიფო კონტროლის პროგრამული მონაცემები;

სურსათის ეროვნული სააგენტო. (n.d.). წლიური ანგარიშები.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

Papaskua, I. ., & Bartia, T. . (2026). Efficiency of Agro-Industrial Product Quality Assessment Systems: International Practices and Challenges for Georgia. Business and Legislation, 19(1), 35–44. Retrieved from https://ojs.b-k.ge/index.php/bk/article/view/1162

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>